|
About Proposition 2 Vote NO on Prop. 2; it’s the UN-SAFE Food Initiative.
|
{mosloadposition prop2vid} |
| {mosloadposition prop2vid2} |
| What the editorial boards have to say… |
|
Measure means well but just isn’t necessary and may end up driving the industry from the state. Prop. 2 — Not for voters: Let Legislature make law Daily Breeze election endorsements Our positions on Nov. 4’s propositions Editorial: Proposition endorsements IJ urges ‘yes’ vote on redistricting measure: Recommendations on Propositions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 11 Editorial: Flawed measures should be rejected Props. 2 and 4 Proposition 2 is a well-intentioned effort — that voters should reject Point/Counterpoint: State ballot propositions Newspaper recommends yes vote on Props 6, 12 PD Editorial: No on Prop. 2 Endorsements ’08: Say ‘No’ to all propositions except 11 Vote no on Proposition 2 Farmers would bear the brunt of Proposition 2 Unneeded Prop. 2 would only hurt California Prop. 2 would destroy our egg industry Voters to become lawmakers again Nov. 4 when propositions need deciding Uncertain animal benefits: Proposition 2 leaves too much room for doubt about its likely outcomes. Why Prop. 2 is a bad idea for agriculture No on Prop. 2: Though admirable, Proposition 2’s ban on tight cages for hens could drive the egg business out of state. Proposition 2 lays an egg on ag industries Why Proposition 2 is a bad idea California Prop. 2 Editorial: A well-intentioned pig in a poke Vote NO on Proposition 2 |